AI Literacy and Professional Development · Meso

Academic guide to generative AI covering teaching and research workflows

The staff counterpart of the student guide addresses academics and researchers. On the teaching side it covers learning outcomes, operations inside the learning management system, assessment and rubrics, accessibility and inclusion. On the research side it covers preparation for literature review, structured reading notes, translation, method and reporting checklists, and reference verification. Data minimisation, disclosure and institutional policy compliance are treated as obligations rather than recommendations.

Record

Level
Meso
Domain
AI Literacy and Professional Development
Institution
Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty
Country
Türkiye
Delivery model
Open and distance
Context
Higher education
Contributed by
Anadolu University
Maturity
Established
Scalability
Embedded
Transferability
Embedded
Source report
AOF-AKA
Tags
staff guidecourse designresearch workflowdisclosure

Account of the practice

The guide states its position at the outset: the technology is treated neither as a rescue nor as a threat, but as an assistant aligned with defined learning objectives and research aims, kept under human judgement and required to be transparent and verifiable. That framing is what allows the document to prescribe workflows without prescribing outcomes.

Its placement at the meso level follows from what it acts upon. The instrument does not tell an academic how to answer a particular question; it shapes course design, assessment instruments, learning management system operations and research reporting, which are the structures a faculty maintains rather than choices made inside a single learning encounter. Read together with the student guide, the pair shows an institution addressing the same technology twice, at two levels, with the audience determining the level.

Source trail

The source on which this record rests, the place in the document and the sentence found there. Quotations are searched for mechanically in the source file and the page on which they were located is recorded.

  1. 01
    AOF-AKA · A Guide to the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Academics
    Anadolu University, Open Education Facultyp. 5Quotation located in the source
    Temel yaklaşım, teknolojiyi ne “kurtarıcı” ne de “tehdit” olarak görmek

    The stated position rules out both advocacy and prohibition, which is what allows the guide to regulate workflows rather than attitudes.

  2. 02
    AOF-AKA · A Guide to the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence for Academics
    Anadolu University, Open Education Facultyp. 5Quotation located in the source
    çift yönlü doğrulama, veri minimizasyonu ve kurumsal politika uyumu zorunlu kabul edilmelidir

    Naming these three as obligations rather than recommendations is what places the instrument above advisory guidance.

Evidence

The reported evidence on the effect of the practice. Evidentiary strength varies between practices; it is reproduced here as the source reports it.

A published document that can be inspected in full, addressed to a named audience and covering both teaching and research workflows.