Practice Matrix · Meso

Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility

Institutional governance · Unequal access to tools, language and disability accommodation, and the distributive effects of AI adoption.

practices
1
Who
1
Where
1
Source report
1

The reading of this intersection

The count in the cell shows density; what the intersection says is carried by the reading below.

Only one record in the partnership treats equity as a design requirement rather than as a concern to be noted. Assessment approaches are developed so as to remain robust to the use of AI while providing differentiated support for diverse needs, and staff training covers responsible use, ethics and inclusivity together.

The limited population of this cell should be read against what respondents report. Students in every round identify unequal access, the cost of premium tools and the absence of digital skills as barriers, and one institution reports extending access to a commercial model to all staff. That measure is recorded under infrastructure because that is how the source describes it, although it also constitutes the clearest equity intervention in the material.

The evidence on training points in the same direction. Students report less access to formal provision than staff and rely instead on peer collaboration and online resources, and the second round found no significant change in this difference over time. An inequality that is measured in the survey data but addressed by only one recorded instrument is a finding in its own right.

Who, and where

The actors carrying out the practice and where they are. Where a source does not name the institution, no attribution is made.

Institutions and actors
  • The Open University
Countries
  • United Kingdom
Context
  • Higher education

How it was done

Each record stands with its imprint, its short reading and the sentence found in the source. Quotations are not shortened, so that a reader can check the inference.

New assessment approaches aim to keep tasks robust to the use of AI while maintaining academic integrity and providing differentiated support for diverse needs. Staff capacity is developed through training on responsible use, ethics and inclusivity, with the institution reporting a shift from high-level guidance to concrete application.

Institution
The Open University
Country
United Kingdom
Delivery model
Fully online
Context
Higher education
Contributed by
not stated in the source
Year
2025
Maturity
Established
Scalability
Established
Transferability
Established
Source report
D3.2
Evidence

The institution itself characterises the shift from guidance to application, which is a claim about implementation rather than intent.

practices have shifted from high-level guidance to concrete applications
D3.2, p. 42